Neuromuscular Training vs Strength Training For ACL
This article is originally featured in the June 2007 issue of Physical Therapy from the Journal of the American Physical Therapy Association
May Arna Risberg, Inger Holm, Grethe Myklebust, Lars Engebretsen
Background and Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a 6-month neuromuscular training (NT) program versus a traditional strength training (ST) program following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
Subjects Seventy-four subjects with ACL reconstruction participated in the study.
Methods The study was a randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial. The NT and ST groups were tested preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months. The main outcome measure was the Cincinnati Knee Score. Secondary outcome measures were visual analog scales (VASs) for pain and function, the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), hop tests, isokinetic muscle strength, proprioception, and static and dynamic balance tests.
Results The NT group demonstrated significantly improved Cincinnati Knee Scores and VAS scores for global knee function compared with the ST group at the 6-month follow-up. There were no significant differences between the groups for the other outcome measures (ie, hop, balance, proprioception, and muscle strength tests).
Discussion and Conclusion The results of this study suggest that exercises included in the NT program should be part of the rehabilitation program following ACL reconstruction.